Actually ... the Obama voters were indifferent. They didn't think they had anything to gain from a failed politician who was an economic nitwit, and their likely voting rates were shockingly low (I loved it!). By reframing the debate, the White House may still lose, but they have a chance of mobilizing their voters to come to the polls for the culture wars, when those voters wouldn't show up at all for an economic vote. Laz has this right, and he expressed it well. Even though the far left's actions are evil and unconstitutional, and we need to stop this horrendous violation of the First Amendment, we also need to move the political debate back to "it's the economy, stupid!"
I’m hoping $5 gasoline will be the key to nuking the Baraqqi presidency.
Actually you are wrong, the media amd Obama are able to fake the economics. They work together to make people think the economy is coming back. That is why Mitt Romney is not the person to be our nominee.
Rush played some Santorum economic bytes today where Santorum was saying that this election should be about LIBERTY.
Right on. This contraceptives thing is a joke. If we quit making a big deal out of it, it will go away.
Here’s what I still can’t get my mind around - Obama must know that eventually a republican will become president. Whether it is next year, 4 years from now or 8 - any precedent a president sets now for an unconstitutional power drive can just as easily be done by a member of the opposition.
Why couldn’t a republican president seize liberal jornolistas as well as liberals in general and place them incommunicado in detention and labor camps while they await disposal - humane disposal, of course?
A republican president could just “up the ante” a little bit.
My question is relative to my own idea that this president acts like he’s going to be the last president.
Isn’t that weird?