[Ancesthntr]

So if Romney can be pinpointed as a shepherd of sorts by Prager w/out riling up conservatives, then when we point out other "shepherding" components of Lds bishop Mitt Romney, then you can let that slide, too.

All of that might be true if:

a) I had actually heard Prager say that (or had heard OF him saying that, which I hadn't until now); and

b) I agreed with Prager.

I happen to disagree with Prager on this point (assuming that you're relating his comments accurately, and I have no particular reason to doubt that you did so). Thus, your argument falls apart. Frankly, if Prager said and meant this, then he's not quite so conservative as some people would make him out to be.

I stand by keeping religion out of politics. Both areas have enough problems of their own to solve without involving the other and its host of problems.

[Colofornian]

Frankly, if Prager said and meant this, then he's not quite so conservative as some people would make him out to be. I stand by keeping religion out of politics. Both areas have enough problems of their own to solve without involving the other and its host of problems.

#1 Prager has indicated that romney is NOT his fave candidate.

But #2 Prager has indicated he will vote for Romney if nominated.

In this way, I guess... (a) You're both on the same page in chiding Republicans to not take religion into consideration (Prager's already on the record in that way...having written a piece about that); and (b) If you, too, would vote for Romney if nominated, then I guess both Dennis & you is "not quite so conservative as some people would make" you both out to be.