I feel pretty sure the whole idea is to do away with the homemade lunch so all the little robots eat the same thing.
Tainted with psychotropic drugs... all for the common good, you know.
There is a school district that does not allow lunch to be brought from home, to force the kids to eat the school lunches.
I can’t find it right now, but it was covered here on FR.
More than likely it's to boost the numbers of kids eating school lunches in order to get Federal money or something like that.
No, the whole idea is to make work for school lunchroom staff. Who, by the way, are unionized.
No. It's more insidious.
They want government to be viewed as the real caregiver and provider.
In Illinois, there are no from home lunches. They're forbidden. In many states, breakfast is offered as well. Meal programs can even last year round whether school is in session or not.
Now we see in North Carolina -- NORTH CAROLINA! -- they accept government telling children their parents aren't feeding them correctly. And being the grandparent, the nanny.
Moving beyond the abortion consent issue, in California thirteen year olds can give direct consent on vaccinations like Gardasil without parental involvement or notification.
In education where parents cannot have CHOICE, parental views, values and faith necessarily gives way to governmental secular humanism.
Free speech is not free if you fall afoul of the government's official position on a topic from evolution to to parenting to appropriate behavior to homosexuality to abortion to marriage to any arbitrary thing.
The Left is plays a multilevel game of seduction with children.