Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smokingfrog

Technically, the school administrator created an “unsafe” condition and may be fined accordingly.

NFPA 101 and the California Bldg Code express that conditions which cause a violation in the codes shall be deemed unsafe in violation of the codes.

In this situation, the ratio of restrooms per occupancy, if reduced below minimal standards, would violate the CBC and probably the Life & Safety Codes.

The school administrator had the authority to close the school, making it secure from public access, but not to eliminate public access to restrooms while the building is occupied.


27 posted on 02/13/2012 12:21:59 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr

Probably violates the pee-nal code too.


29 posted on 02/13/2012 12:25:03 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson