Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sthguard
6% after zero campaigning, in a region with near-zero conservatives? I’d hardly call that a “total collapse,” but keep drinking your koolaid.

Santorum did not campaign there either, but got 10% more. Not sure what "koolaid" you think I am drinking. There is something called momentum. Newt had it after S.C., and then lost it with two disastrous debate performances. Can he get it back? Perhaps only if Santorum slips up, because Newt seems to have lost a coherent message, and is running out of cash fast.

60 posted on 02/12/2012 6:59:58 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: montag813

Santorum is a good candidate, and I would be just fine with him winning the nomination. But I firmly believe that Newt would be the better President: he’s got the plans, the contacts, the ideas, and the willpower. Santorum has a message that certainly appeals to social conservatives, but I just haven’t seen him show evidence of preparation to the same extent that Newt has.


66 posted on 02/12/2012 4:54:42 PM PST by sthguard (The DNC theme song: "All You Need is Guv")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson