Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

The whole issue is being mis-framed as a violation only of the freedom of religion of religious employers. The fact of the matter is that it is a violation of the freedom of religion of anyone who opposes abortion and contraception and is an employer. My brother is a partner in a law firm he co-founded. He has an agreement with his partners not to include abortion, abortion-inducing drugs, or contraceptives in their employee Heath plan. He did this over 20 years ago because he accepts the Catholic Church’s teachings on these issues. If this mandate stands, then his freedom of religion not to cooperate in abortion and contraception are also being violated. In fact, the FREEDOM of EVERYONE not to do so is being violated, whether or not they choose to use that freedom.


7 posted on 02/09/2012 5:30:22 PM PST by StonyMan451 (As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StonyMan451

where is this firm? I wish I could find similar to work for


11 posted on 02/09/2012 5:31:58 PM PST by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: StonyMan451
The irony...contraceptives and abortions are dirt cheap.

They just love the power, love sticking it to people who resent this tyrannizing. There is no impediment at all to getting BC or even abortions.

28 posted on 02/09/2012 6:52:39 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: StonyMan451

Everyone’s freedom is violated because EVERYONE has to pay for it in their co-pays and/or monthly premiums, even if they would personally choose not to have that option for themselves, WE ALL must pay for those services for everyone else.

I should not have to be forced to supplement the costs for abortions, abortion services, contraception, contraception devices, including the morning after pill, and/or abortion counseling services and/or providers.


31 posted on 02/09/2012 7:38:43 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: StonyMan451

“He did this over 20 years ago because he accepts the Catholic Church’s teachings on these issues.”

Unfortunately his Church (of which I am also a member) doesn’t seem concerned with his quandary, only their own.


35 posted on 02/09/2012 10:10:26 PM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson