Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: red flanker

Can you say Supreme Court Justices Roberts and Alito, which Specter pushed through as part of the deal with Santorum?


3 posted on 02/08/2012 3:42:29 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timber Rattler

Can you say Supreme Court Justices Roberts and Alito, which Specter pushed through as part of the deal with Santorum?

First time I have heard this. Please, more information!


9 posted on 02/08/2012 3:46:01 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

I read somewhere recently that Santorum’s support for Specter was payback for Specter’s help during Santorum’s first senate campaign. Evidently he would never have been elected without Arlen’s financial/political support.

Just found it, article by Michael Barone:
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/why-did-santorum-endorse-specter-2004/287596


11 posted on 02/08/2012 3:48:02 PM PST by Ozone34 ("There are only two philosophies: Thomism and bullshitism!" -Leon Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

I guess it ain’t as bad as putting Dede Scozzafava on SCOTUS


23 posted on 02/08/2012 3:59:27 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

And before that, Clarence Thomas. Specter was also instrumental in deconstructing the smear job against him and saving that nomination. That was another item that was a much more prominent part of Specter’s resume at the time of Santorum’s endorsement in addition to his efforts to block Hillarycare...and probably also looking out for his state since seniority is such a huge factor in the pecking order of the Senate (that is a purely political consideration, no doubt...take it for what it is worth). This article judges the endorsement based mostly on things that happened well after that day that were not part of the equation at the time.


87 posted on 02/08/2012 5:42:47 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

I have read that argument before but I have a hard time believing Specter was the only guy who could have done it. How will the Senate function without him?


104 posted on 02/09/2012 1:32:43 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson