Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo

Take that, Newtbots!!


2 posted on 02/07/2012 7:31:55 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre
It' s almost embarrassing to watch you infants get so orgasmic over a nonevent (no delegates, no nothing, just a bunch of wasted money). I would feel sorry for you because I know you will soon have your tender faces smeared in the dirt by the Romney money machine, the very machine that gave you life in Iowa. And you don't even see it coming. Pathetic actually.
13 posted on 02/07/2012 7:37:19 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Take that ROMNEY!!!!


15 posted on 02/07/2012 7:39:30 PM PST by toddausauras (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

“take that Newtbots”? Dude, he wasn’t even on the ballot.. Not to mention no one gets any electors from Missouri tonight. Hardly qualifies as smack down for Newt since he wasn’t even participating, but I am glad Santorum beat Mittens though, that’s for sure!


20 posted on 02/07/2012 7:41:45 PM PST by Craigon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Had Newt been on the ballot..he more than likely would have won. Recent Polls showed Missourians favoring him but he didn’t file here.


23 posted on 02/07/2012 7:46:09 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (The 2nd Amendment IS my concealed carry permit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre; AmericanInTokyo

Can we now drop the canard that it is futile to support Santorum, that he cant win, that a vote for anybody but Newt is a vote for Romney, etc?


30 posted on 02/07/2012 7:51:02 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Take what? Newt wasn’t even on the ballot and no delegates were awarded. That said, Romney is still a LOSER! This will get some positive headlines for Santorum and will help his campaign. The Romney smear machine and his cheerleaders in the media will now turn their guns on Rick. Buying the nomination is going to cost Romney and his friends more than they thought.


34 posted on 02/07/2012 7:53:22 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Low voter turnout and btw...how many delegates does Little Ricky have now? wait until he is vetted before the public and the next REAL election in MO. Debate on Feb 28th. Lots of folks I talked to said they wanted Newt on the Mo ballet...voted for Santorum to block Romney. A vote for Santorum is a vote for Romney...Little vest man ain’t going nowhere...take that to the bank


43 posted on 02/07/2012 8:03:31 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

I suggest we control ourselves and hold our fire against both Newt and Santorum.

I’m for Newt but I’m glad Santorum beat Romney. If Santorum can actually get some momentum and beat Romney, I will be grateful.

If Newt can make a comeback on super Tuesday, I will be more grateful.

But I’m not gonna slam either of them right now.

We need to be slamming Obama.


59 posted on 02/07/2012 8:29:30 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

I suggest a Pax AntiRomneyicus.


83 posted on 02/07/2012 9:26:47 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Take that Mittbots....


95 posted on 02/07/2012 10:15:24 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Don’t be that way. I support any conservative! I very much was for Newt, but if Rick takes up the slack...then I’m all for him.


98 posted on 02/07/2012 11:03:50 PM PST by Rick_Michael ( 'REAL' Conservatives who witch hunt their own, are no better than Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

I’m amused at the use of “bots” or “bot” behind someone’s name if a person favors that other person. Does someone always have to be a “bot” to like or support someone? If that were the case, would that make you a Santorumbot? It used to be called voting your principles if you supported someone who thought like you, now it makes you a bot?

Not to be seen as picking on you, it’s just that the phrase “bot” is so overblown as to be sophomoric these days. Oh and by the way, the contest that your person won today in my state, Missouri...he didn’t really win anything...no delgates, no nothing.

So I guess I could say, take that Santorumbot.


99 posted on 02/07/2012 11:11:16 PM PST by MissouriConservative (Voting "None of the Above" in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

I am a Newtbot...non sequitur...does not compute..impomplete data.


104 posted on 02/08/2012 6:37:53 AM PST by Leep (It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Newtbots or Romneybots ???!!!

You have a real problem and confirm that you are runing against Gingrich and not to win for USA....

We will see your behaviour soon


116 posted on 02/08/2012 4:15:24 PM PST by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2843567/posts

At least Newt did NOT stop the ‘impeachment’ of the gutter snipe Clinton.... but guess who refused to have a ‘real’ trial in the Senate... And some claim they vote for ‘principled’ people.... s n i c k e r

Oh, and for any whose knee-jerk reaction is I support Romney, well I voted yesterday. In the ‘show me’ state of MO there was the option of ‘uncommitted’ and that is where my X went.

118 posted on 02/08/2012 9:53:57 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson