Skip to comments.
Santorum Wins Missouri Primary
Wall Street Journal ^
| 7 Feb. 2012
| Michael Crittendom, Neil King Jr.
Posted on 02/07/2012 7:27:28 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
So much for "inevitability", US Mass Media and White House.
To: AmericanInTokyo
To: AmericanInTokyo
3
posted on
02/07/2012 7:32:13 PM PST
by
oust the louse
(The presstitutes think after a few primaries it's over ...Santorum says: GAME ON)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Santorum is a UNION LOVING PHONEY
4
posted on
02/07/2012 7:32:50 PM PST
by
WellyP
(REAL)
To: AmericanInTokyo
It shows that Mitt Romney isn’t the strong candidate that the establishment says he is.
5
posted on
02/07/2012 7:32:51 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: AmericanInTokyo; Pete-R-Bilt; writer33
Hopefully, he won’t just inherit the crap storm from the lamestream and gop elite. Wackamole, grand rounds.
6
posted on
02/07/2012 7:33:05 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(I didn't leave the Republican party, it left me.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Turnout low since no delegates at stake, but it tells you something about who’s motivated to vote across the river in MO. Except for St. Louis and KC, there’s not much affection for the Occupier of the White House.
7
posted on
02/07/2012 7:33:05 PM PST
by
One Name
(Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Wait. Missouri Primary?
I thought Missouri is a Straw poll, and non-binding.?
I mean I’m glad Santorum won, but I like to be more precise in terminology.
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
9
posted on
02/07/2012 7:33:54 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(FReep this FReepathon!)
To: WellyP
If you think Romney should be the nominee, that’s your right.
10
posted on
02/07/2012 7:34:26 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
To: LegendHasIt
Lost their primary status- hacked the RNC off by moving the date up w/o blessing so no delegates at stake. Gingrich didn’t even pay the $1000 to get on the ballot.
Not real important now, but MO is always important in November.
11
posted on
02/07/2012 7:36:17 PM PST
by
One Name
(Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Everbody knows this means nothing toward the nomination...
Right?
12
posted on
02/07/2012 7:37:03 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: mamelukesabre
It' s almost embarrassing to watch you infants get so orgasmic over a nonevent (no delegates, no nothing, just a bunch of wasted money). I would feel sorry for you because I know you will soon have your tender faces smeared in the dirt by the Romney money machine, the very machine that gave you life in Iowa. And you don't even see it coming. Pathetic actually.
To: hinckley buzzard
MSNBC just projected Santorum also wins MINNESOTA!
Willard going down big time tonight!
14
posted on
02/07/2012 7:39:17 PM PST
by
NKP_Vet
(creep.)
To: mamelukesabre
To: WellyP
Then you would be a Gingrich supporter, that’s good.
16
posted on
02/07/2012 7:40:24 PM PST
by
svcw
(Only difference between Romney & BH is one thinks he will be god & other one thinks he already is.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
This is AWESOME!!! Romney going down. The ONLY thing Romney had was a veneer of inevitability. It’s gone, daddy, gone!!!
To: AmericanInTokyo
Chas. Krauthammer and Karl Rove are drinking in a bar somewhere tonight. It would be great if Willard’s bandwagon would sputter to a stop before March 1.
To: AmericanInTokyo
Totally useless for acquiring delegates. Potentially very useful for acquiring momentum.
Santorum is everybody's second choice and the favorite choice of 1 in 5 of us.
The Gingrich people say they will never vote for Romney. The Romney people say they will never vote for Gingrich.
The big focus should be giving Obama a pink slip. We need a candidate we can unite behind; a candidate who can make the election about Obama's sorry record and not about their personality (Newt) or lack thereof (Mitt). The GOP could do a hell of a lot worse than Rick Santorum . . . and has.
19
posted on
02/07/2012 7:40:53 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: mamelukesabre
“take that Newtbots”? Dude, he wasn’t even on the ballot.. Not to mention no one gets any electors from Missouri tonight. Hardly qualifies as smack down for Newt since he wasnt even participating, but I am glad Santorum beat Mittens though, that’s for sure!
20
posted on
02/07/2012 7:41:45 PM PST
by
Craigon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson