[Mariner]

You're still right, unfortunately.

This battle is already lost.

Our only recourse is to get government sanction of marriage...to include all tax benefits etc. out of the mix. Only when government recognizes no marriage will this abomination be tolerable.

[DNA.2012]

Our only recourse is to get government sanction of marriage...to include all tax benefits etc. out of the mix.

And there is the answer.

[DNA.2012]

Our only recourse is to get government sanction of marriage...to include all tax benefits etc. out of the mix.

And there is the answer.

[longtermmemmory]

the only way to do that would be to abolish inheritance, paternity, maternity and anything family related.

IOW no property rights at all.

no property of person.
no real property
no personal property
no intelectual property
no property of ones associations

nice going comrade, big brother loves you. (that way)

[Nowhere Man]

You're still right, unfortunately.

This battle is already lost.

Our only recourse is to get government sanction of marriage...to include all tax benefits etc. out of the mix. Only when government recognizes no marriage will this abomination be tolerable.

I'm in the same boat, maybe government ought to get out of this altogether, change the tax code to where you have a flat tax charged when you make above a certain amount of money. In this case, I don't care who or what you marry. Now if we keep government involved, I like what the Russians and Serbians did, enact a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

The way it is now, if this passes then how can we deny other forms of marriage, if two heterosexuals can marry and if two homosexuals can, then I cannot deny a polygamist or some guy who wants to marry his goat. We opened Pandora's Box here, a really big barrel of monkeys.