Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40

If two guys can get married through this, then ALL “marriages” are legal!

INSANE!


25 posted on 02/07/2012 10:58:55 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik

Thank God for that! Because I’ve always wanted to marry my car. </sarc>


27 posted on 02/07/2012 11:04:44 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("No. But I will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: VanDeKoik

Gingrich supports the federal marriage amendment.

Santorum PROBABLY does

Now is a time to lock Mitt into the pro Federal Marriage Amendment corner since he is competing for the nomination.

kookpaul? who knows.


45 posted on 02/07/2012 12:29:49 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: VanDeKoik
You're right there. If there are no limitations for marriage, then confining it to unrelated couples or multiples of couples is also unreasonable. It would serve as a good test if some wealthy widower would agitate to marry his children and grandchildren. Surely the love would be there. Is there a test the state will institute to mandate sexual behavior? Such a marriage would destroy inheritance taxes. As a married member, each of the "partners" would be entitled to an equal share of the property.

Upon the death of the estate holder, each surviving "spouse" would be entitled to their share of the estate before the remainder would go to probate. States and the federal government could lose untold sums.

56 posted on 02/07/2012 1:54:16 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson