Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Atom by atom, butt up against other atoms, and examining probabilities, there are windows of opportunity that've been known since the early 1930s.

While individual nuclear reactions can release significant energy at the atomic scale, you need a lot of them occurring in the same place over a short time period to get significant energy production at the macroscopic level. This was the basis of chain reaction theory developed by Meitner, Fermi and others in the 1930s. As discussed above, there is no credible evidence that uncontrolled criticality has occurred in the damaged cores.

If you're alluding to quantum effects, things like tunneling and so forth, you really need to do a calculation that relates to the probability of those things happening with the particles that are interacting. That quantity, called the expectation value, is vanishingly small for classical particles interacting at energies in the tens or hundreds of MeV range.

Aside from that, I must admit I don't know what you mean by "windows of opportunity".

Certainly some of the red-hot radioactive waste with short half-lives has to be doing something.

It was. It was decaying, releasing energy, some of which showed up eventually as thermal energy which produced other effects, fuel damage, hydrogen evolution, etc. All of this is well-known and understood from decades (going back to the 1950s) of studying the likely evolution of LWR core accidents. The thermal energy released in decay heat, while producing chemical effects and changes in the state of materials, was insufficient to approach the unification energy for the electroweak force, certainly insufficient to initiate even random fusion events. If you don't have the energy, those things simply don't happen.

21 posted on 02/07/2012 8:28:52 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
Widom and Larsen are probably watching this experiment in Japan ~ and are likely not going to travel there any time soon.
33 posted on 02/07/2012 12:30:35 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: chimera
Just a note: the probability of large waves occurring is a function of the number of smaller waves. Not so long ago when a ship was swamped or went down as a result of wave action people who wanted to finish out their nautical careers in peace kept their mouths shut about it.

Then, finally, the rogue waves were found, and they weren't as rogue as once thought ~ in fact, they are quite predictable ~ today we have computers analyzing satellite images to see if they are out and about.

What a change.

Now, keep that mind as we revisit your statement about ".... That quantity, called the expectation value, is vanishingly small for classical particles ....." ~ no doubt you've had to think about this in the past so what is the explanation for classical wave forms? (understanding that all those particles are themselves waves of some kind, and in various manners linked together).

Can we change the functions that create the columbe barrier in virtually any wave form? Or are we simply stuck with condensed states of matter as suggested by Widom and Larsen?

Seems to me that if we can sink a large ship with simple wave functions we should be able to stuff a proton or two inside a hydrogen nucleus, right?

34 posted on 02/07/2012 12:44:11 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson