Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
This is like “whack a mole” -— no matter what the Birthers come up with, there arguments are defeated, yet they never seem to want to admit how weak their case is!

No matter how hard they get “whacked” they don't pay any attention to facts, law or history, or basic English language comprehension.

93 posted on 02/06/2012 7:25:55 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58
This is like “whack a mole” -— no matter what the Birthers come up with, there arguments are defeated, yet they never seem to want to admit how weak their case is!

Your side has not defeated any arguments. Your parroting of the opinions of long dead lawyers is irrelevant to what the FOUNDERS meant when they wrote that.

The case is not weak. It is the Lawyers understanding of what is the actual law that is weak. It is a disease that afflicts the entire profession.

No matter how hard they get “whacked” they don't pay any attention to facts, law or history, or basic English language comprehension.

A more fitting description of your behavior. Tell me again that birthers made up the "two parent" requirement.

255 posted on 02/07/2012 10:52:04 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson