To: philman_36
The Naturalization Act undoubtedly covered ambassadors serving overseas, but I don’t see anything in the act that would limit it to diplomats. I also don’t see any debate in the Congressional Globe that would indicate some intent that was not obvious - that American citizens whose children were born outside the country would be able to pass on citizenship to those children. If you know of a source indicating there was more to it than that, please link.
To: philman_36
And please indicate what relevance it has to the specific thread.
To: sometime lurker
Here are the pages from the "Annals of Congress" which cover the debate.
@View pages 1147 and 1148
February 3, 1790
@
View pages 1149 and 1150February 3, 1790
@
View pages 1151 and 1152February 3, 1790
@
View pages 1153 and 1154February 3, 1790
@
View pages 1155 and 1156February 3, 1790
@
View pages 1157 and 1158February 4, 1790
@
View pages 1159 and 1160February 4, 1790
@
View pages 1161 and 1162February 4, 1790
@
View pages 1163 and 1164February 4, 1790
I find no instance of "children" being mentioned either, yet is is in the bill.
Why is that?
637 posted on
02/16/2012 8:04:12 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson