Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

The Naturalization Act undoubtedly covered ambassadors serving overseas, but I don’t see anything in the act that would limit it to diplomats. I also don’t see any debate in the Congressional Globe that would indicate some intent that was not obvious - that American citizens whose children were born outside the country would be able to pass on citizenship to those children. If you know of a source indicating there was more to it than that, please link.


632 posted on 02/15/2012 9:04:12 PM PST by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

And please indicate what relevance it has to the specific thread.


633 posted on 02/15/2012 9:06:52 PM PST by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]

To: sometime lurker
Here are the pages from the "Annals of Congress" which cover the debate.

@View pages 1147 and 1148
February 3, 1790


@View pages 1149 and 1150
February 3, 1790
@View pages 1151 and 1152
February 3, 1790
@View pages 1153 and 1154
February 3, 1790
@View pages 1155 and 1156
February 3, 1790
@View pages 1157 and 1158
February 4, 1790
@View pages 1159 and 1160
February 4, 1790
@View pages 1161 and 1162
February 4, 1790
@View pages 1163 and 1164
February 4, 1790

I find no instance of "children" being mentioned either, yet is is in the bill.
Why is that?

637 posted on 02/16/2012 8:04:12 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson