[Kansas58]

Sure there was a reason.

The Founders made a distinction between Natural Born and Naturalized.

PERIOD!

Natural Born means Citizen at Birth and nothing more.

I notice that you quote Congressional Legislation from 1795. Very well, that law has been stricken and changed several times.

[philman_36]

Very well, that law has been stricken and changed several times.
Speaking of the law...

@The Sense of the Senate Resolution was appropriate in that case and it conflicts with nothing I have posted, here.

@Is that Sense of the Senate Resolution law?

Why do you refuse to answer my question?

I mean, @you tried to answer it yet still failed to do so.

However, the purpose of any Resolution in the House or Senate is much like a Preamble, explaining law or legal findings or legislation that happens later or after said resolution.
I know what it's purpose is.
Just answer the question...Is that Sense of the Senate Resolution law? Yes or no.

[Para-Ord.45]

” ... that law has been stricken and changed several times.” With penumbras and emanations. Yeah, heard that argument before, “ Killing babies is written right there in the Constitution. Only an idiot can`t see it.”

When it some to the law the last stop on that train is the USSC:

Minor v. Happersett (1874)

” ...It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction,”

Perkins v. Elg’s (1939)

The USSC just cleared up the distinction for you.

CASE CLOSED