Dean Haskins loathes and detests Orly Taitz. I would not put great stock in what he says regarding her. Apart from that, much of her case was BASED on proving that the document is a forgery. How can you argue that she made no objection to the document when she called in witnesses and conducted slide shows to DEMONSTRATE that the document was fraudulent?
To contend that she didn't object to the document's legitimacy is a non sequitur.
It's not my argument, it's what's in the record. If I understand the legal process correctly, she would have had to say "I object" when the document was admitted into evidence. Apparently, she didn't.