Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
It seems you responded while I was making my reply.

You forget that these "citizens" begat "natural born citizens. Anyone born there of citizen parents is now a natural born citizen, whether congress said so of the original citizens or not.
The language is concise. There is no sunset date in the statute so how is it eliminated to allow natural born citizens to be born?

275 posted on 02/07/2012 12:23:43 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
The language is concise. There is no sunset date in the statute so how is it eliminated to allow natural born citizens to be born?

I'll have to go back and look at it. From my initial reading it would seem that if a statute made them citizens, then their offspring would thereafter be "natural born citizens."

I have to go now, i'll resume where I left off later, or perhaps tomorrow.

320 posted on 02/07/2012 1:57:42 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
The language is concise. There is no sunset date in the statute so how is it eliminated to allow natural born citizens to be born?

The same way the Sun rises in the East every morning, in spite of what positive law requires or prohibits. A person is either alive or dead, a natural citizen or not, regardless of the law.

355 posted on 02/07/2012 4:42:19 PM PST by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson