Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Claim, I am going to call you a LIAR, and I am not going to stop calling you a LIAR.

If I had a nickel for each time birthers called me a liar, I'd have a lot of nickels. Meanwhile, no court anywhere in the country is buying any of this so-called "truth" the birthers are selling. Obama is still the President of the United States and birthers are no closer today in removing him on the basis of his eligibility than they were three years ago. Ping the mods if you want. This stuff was bunk three years ago when Chief Justice Roberts swore Obama in to office and it is bunk today, as Friday's ruling in Georgia once again clearly stated.

232 posted on 02/07/2012 8:51:37 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68
If I had a nickel for each time birthers called me a liar, I'd have a lot of nickels.

Anyone can CALL someone a Liar. If you say it again, I will DEMONSTRATE to all and sundry that you ARE a liar. Call me on it. Say it again.

Meanwhile, no court anywhere in the country is buying any of this so-called "truth" the birthers are selling.

Truth and the legal system are not well acquainted. Note Roe v Wade, Kelo v New London, Lawrence v Texas, etc.

Obama is still the President of the United States and birthers are no closer today in removing him on the basis of his eligibility than they were three years ago.

None of those assertions are proof that we are incorrect.

Ping the mods if you want. This stuff was bunk three years ago when Chief Justice Roberts swore Obama in to office and it is bunk today, as Friday's ruling in Georgia once again clearly stated.

That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. What you are not entitled to is the privilege of falsely accusing people of "this two citizen parent" so-called "requirement" is nothing more than a fictional device created by birthers to be a standard of eligibility that Obama could not possibly meet." after having been shown demonstrable proof that this is not true.

Now you can challenge my proof (I have more besides this) or you can refrain from saying we made up this requirement. The requirement HAS historical reference. We didn't make it up. You can believe and assert that the issue is bunk, but you cannot accuse us of falsely fabricating it.

If you want me to be your shadow till one of us is gone, just call us liars again.

298 posted on 02/07/2012 1:09:53 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson