Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Again, Why Not Santorum? (He's a true conservative and he can beat Obama)
National Review ^ | 02/06/2012 | Quinn Hillyer

Posted on 02/06/2012 6:59:48 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2012 6:59:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No, he isn’t and no, he can’t.


2 posted on 02/06/2012 7:01:58 AM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Reminds me of an Everly Brothers oldie...

“Dream, dream dream dream, dream, dream dream dream, dream...”


3 posted on 02/06/2012 7:04:02 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because he’s not, and he can’t.


4 posted on 02/06/2012 7:04:02 AM PST by TheZMan (Obama is without a doubt the worst President ever elected to these United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe because he’s NOT a conservative? Look at his voting record (which he politely never mentions). It’s big government spending all the way, and he even gave his union buddies a break by voting AGAINST the right to work law.


5 posted on 02/06/2012 7:04:08 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

I know......only the great messiah known as newt leroy....newt is and can...despite the fact that a case of vd is more popular than he is among the general voters


6 posted on 02/06/2012 7:07:22 AM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
MO will show that Santorum can beat Romney. Something Newt can't do unless he gets a chance to attack John King again 24-48 hours before the vote.

Santorum's not perfect, by a longshot but he's more reliably conservative than the intellectually elastic Newt is and he has the added bonus of NOT having Newt's sordid past attached to him.

7 posted on 02/06/2012 7:09:15 AM PST by pgkdan (Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You gotta give Rick Santorum credit, he has chalked up quite a few close 3rd and fourth place victories so far and it looks like he’s poised to continue that streak all the way to the convention.


8 posted on 02/06/2012 7:09:31 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not a great communicator. Sorry, but in this media-mad age, it matters....a lot.

For starters, tell him to stop grinding his teeth.


9 posted on 02/06/2012 7:09:40 AM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

RE: Look at his voting record (which he politely never mentions). It’s big government spending all the way,

ALL THE WAY? AS IN ALL THE TIME?

SOURCE: http://www.issues2000.org/senate/Rick_Santorum.htm

Rick Santorum on Budget & Economy

Voted YES on $40B in reduced federal overall spending. (Dec 2005)

Voted YES on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts. (Apr 2000)

Voted YES on 1998 GOP budget. (May 1997)

Voted YES on Balanced-budget constitutional amendment. (Mar 1997)

_____________________________

Rick Santorum on Health Care

Voted YES on limiting medical liability lawsuits to $250,000. (May 2006)

Voted NO on expanding enrollment period for Medicare Part D. (Feb 2006)

Voted NO on increasing Medicaid rebate for producing generics. (Nov 2005)

Voted NO on negotiating bulk purchases for Medicare prescription drug. (Mar 2005)

Voted NO on $40 billion per year for limited Medicare prescription drug benefit. (Jun 2003)

Voted NO on allowing reimportation of Rx drugs from Canada. (Jul 2002)

Voted NO on allowing patients to sue HMOs & collect punitive damages. (Jun 2001)

Voted YES on funding GOP version of Medicare prescription drug benefit. (Apr 2001)

Voted NO on including prescription drugs under Medicare. (Jun 2000)

Voted YES on limiting self-employment health deduction. (Jul 1999)

Voted NO on increasing tobacco restrictions. (Jun 1998)

Voted YES on Medicare means-testing. (Jun 1997)

Voted NO on blocking medical savings acounts. (Apr 1996)
Rated 0% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)


10 posted on 02/06/2012 7:11:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: livius
and i heard he wants a “humane” immigration policy..and thinks “300” pages of obama care is great and supports the individual mandate and believes in global warming and took oodles of freddie and fannie money..and played kissy face on the couch with nancy and huggy huggy with kerry....oh newt..im sorry
11 posted on 02/06/2012 7:12:15 AM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No, please, no more (not you, just this entire thing)

We need to get behind Newt before it’s too late.

The media has not won yet.


12 posted on 02/06/2012 7:12:31 AM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’ll get my vote in Michigan.


13 posted on 02/06/2012 7:12:43 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


After NV, tally would be approximately
Romney 51 Newt 45
when FL vote divided per RNC rules!

Pass the word!


Click t-shirt to Donate to Newt Gingrich

CONTACT FOR RNC: website@nrcc.org

310 First Street
Washington DC 20003

Encourage them to do the RIGHT thing:
end the FL fiasco NOW! Play by the rules!

14 posted on 02/06/2012 7:12:54 AM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
"he's more reliably conservative than the intellectually elastic Newt is and he has the added bonus of NOT having Newt's sordid past attached to him. "

That describes 20 million people including myself...should I run?

15 posted on 02/06/2012 7:13:29 AM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
I know......only the great messiah known as newt leroy....newt is and can...despite the fact that a case of vd is more popular than he is among the general voters

And Gingrich knows this, he's in it for himself. If he really cared about defeating Obama, He'd put aside his Galaxy Class ego and throw his support behind the only conservative who can, Rick Santorum.

16 posted on 02/06/2012 7:16:05 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

RE: Because he’s not, and he can’t.

SOURCE:

http://www.issues2000.org/senate/Rick_Santorum.htm

Rick Santorum on Welfare & Poverty

Voted YES on welfare block grants. (Aug 1996)

Voted NO on eliminating block grants for food stamps. (Jul 1996)

Voted YES on allowing state welfare waivers. (Jul 1996)

Voted YES on welfare overhaul. (Sep 1995)

Tax credits to promite home ownership in distressed areas. (Apr 2003)

______________________________

Rick Santorum on Tax Reform

Voted YES on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts. (Aug 2006)

Voted YES on permanently repealing the `death tax`. (Jun 2006)

Voted NO on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut. (Feb 2006)

Voted YES on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends. (Feb 2006)

Voted YES on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends. (Nov 2005)

Voted YES on $350 billion in tax breaks over 11 years. (May 2003)

Voted NO on reducing marriage penalty instead of cutting top tax rates. (May 2001)

Voted YES on eliminating the ‘marriage penalty’. (Jul 2000)

Voted YES on across-the-board spending cut. (Oct 1999)

Voted YES on requiring super-majority for raising taxes. (Apr 1998)

Rated 81% by NTU, indicating a “Taxpayer’s Friend” on tax votes

__________________________

Rick Santorum on Social Security

Supports privatization if voluntary. (Sep 2006)

Voted YES on Social Security Lockbox & limiting national debt. (Apr 1999)

Voted YES on allowing Roth IRAs for retirees. (May 1998)

Voted YES on allowing personal retirement accounts. (Apr 1998)

Voted YES on deducting Social Security payments on income taxes. (May 1996)

_________________________________

Rick Santorum on Jobs

Voted NO on raising the minimum wage to $7.25 rather than $6.25. (Mar 2005)

Voted YES on repealing Clinton’s ergonomic rules on repetitive stress. (Mar 2001)

Voted YES on killing an increase in the minimum wage. (Nov 1999)

Voted YES on allowing workers to choose between overtime & comp-time. (May 1997)

Voted NO on replacing farm price supports. (Feb 1996)
Rated 0% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record

_________________________________

As for him not being able to beat Obama...

SOURCE:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290180/rasmussen-santorum-45-obama-44-robert-costa

Here’s the Feb 4 Rasmussen Poll.

Rasmussen: Santorum 45, Obama 44

The latest Rasmussen tracking poll offers some encouragement:

In a potential Election 2012 matchup, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum is at 45% while President Obama earns 44%. This is the first time in any poll that Santorum has led the president. Several other GOP challengers have led the president a single time in the polls including Rick Perry, Herman Cain, and Newt Gingrich. Each man briefly held the lead while they were surging in the polls, only to fall quickly. It remains to be seen what will happen to Santorum’s support.


17 posted on 02/06/2012 7:16:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What has happened to the Republican Party? Seriously. The limited government conservatives get nowhere and we are left in this cycle as well as the last cycle with candidates who, to one degree or another, have a love affair with government. Santorum talks the right talk but his voting record — from 1992 through 2006 — reveals a populist. Someone who is conservative on social issues like abortion and gay marriage and moderate (to downright liberal) on expanding government. And Rick was the co-founder, with Tom DeLay, of the Republican’s “K Street Project” which was about as far from limited government as you can get. Rick voted and even floor-managed votes to push Bush’s entitlement expansions. Then there is Newt, who arguably has a good record from the 90s. But then look at all the times he’s gone off the reservation sitting with Nancy on the couch, supporting Freddie and Fannie, etc. Then there’s Romney — enough said. Then you get someone with a limited government record like Perry and he falls apart. I don’t understand it. The Gods must be conspiring to keep Obama in office.


18 posted on 02/06/2012 7:16:43 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

RE: and i heard he wants a “humane” immigration policy

SOURCE:

http://www.issues2000.org/senate/Rick_Santorum.htm

Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)

Voted NO on establishing a Guest Worker program. (May 2006)

Voted NO on allowing illegal aliens to participate in
Social Security. (May 2006)

Voted NO on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship. (May 2006)

Voted YES on allowing more foreign workers into the US for farm work. (Jul 1998)

Voted YES on visas for skilled workers. (May 1998)

Voted YES on limit welfare for immigrants. (Jun 1997)


19 posted on 02/06/2012 7:18:35 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Nice analytical, dispassionate examination of the facts. Have you thought about a career in media?


20 posted on 02/06/2012 7:20:09 AM PST by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson