Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII

The claim is that red light cameras are for safety, but I would dispute this. It was clear that Houston was using them as a revenue enhancement scheme when the yellow light times got to be ridiculously short. The result was more rear end collisions.


40 posted on 02/06/2012 3:56:03 AM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Hayek

Houston voters overturned City Council and the Mayor and had the red-light cameras turned off and taken down.


47 posted on 02/06/2012 6:03:20 AM PST by 38special (It's a no-win situation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Hayek

—The claim is that red light cameras are for safety, but I would dispute this—

It’s easy to dispute, since most tickets are for rolling stops before making a free right turnd. That activity is not even all that dangerous. It is the people going THROUGH the intersection that these are being advertized to prevent.

And in one city in Texas they turned off the cameras and the accident rate went DOWN. The city was so embarrassed that they tried to argue that they just had really good weather so there were less accidents.

It is ALL about money. Safety is not even a red herring, because even a red herring has “some” credibility.


48 posted on 02/06/2012 6:04:11 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson