I remember when they raised the Roman Catholic issue with JFK. I think an excerpt from his Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association would be good here:
While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election; the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Floridathe humiliating treatment of our President and Vice President by those who no longer respect our powerthe hungry children I saw in West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills, the families forced to give up their farmsan America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space.
These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issuesfor war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers.
“Real Issues . . . Have Been Obscured” by Religion:
But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President, the real issues in this campaign have been obscuredperhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once againnot what kind of church I believe in, for that should be important only to mebut what kind of America I believe in.
I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolutewhere no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to votewhere no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preferenceand where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewishwhere no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical sourcewhere no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officialsand where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.
For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jewor a Quakeror a Unitarianor a Baptist. It was Virginia’s harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson’s statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victimbut tomorrow it may be youuntil the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.
JFK did better with Protestants than any democrat Presidential candidate had done in a dozen years, he won 38%, which was an improvement over previous years.
How this is related to the left wing Bishop Romney, I don’t know.
Unfortunately, the political views of Mormons are nothing like the Catholic Church. From its very beginning, Joseph Smith has taught that Mormons would rule the United States and then the world as a Theocracy. Since Mitt Romney will follow the dictates of the Mormon Church, the entire Executive Branch of the Federal government will be under the conrol of the heirarchy of his church.
Vetting this kind of agenda cannot be dismissed as “religious bigotry”.