Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STOCK Act passes in the Senate
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57370812-503544/stock-act-passes-in-the-senate/http://conservatives4palin.com/2012/02/peter-schweizer-reacts-to-the-stock-act-passing-in-the-senate.html ^ | 2-4-2012

Posted on 02/04/2012 12:08:15 PM PST by ak267

Last Thursday, the US Senate passed the STOCK Act, legislation that would ban members of congress from insider trading.

From CBS News:

Members of Congress are already subject to insider trading laws. But it is currently within the law for a lawmaker to buy a company’s stock after learning, for example, that an upcoming bill will grant that company a large government contract.

The ultimate fate of the STOCK (Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge) Act, which comes in the wake of a “60 Minutes” story on potential congressional insider trading, remains unclear – though its prospects are relatively good. Passage in the Senate was complicated by a flurry of amendments added to the legislation, including a proposal that senators be prevented from owning individual stocks unless they are in a blind trust, and another that senators who become lobbyists lose their pensions. Some lawmakers expressed skittishness at the efforts to broaden the scope of the legislation…

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: congress; schweizer; stockact; trading

1 posted on 02/04/2012 12:08:21 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ak267
Last Thursday, the US Senate passed the STOCK Act, legislation that would ban members of congress from insider trading.

Yet they can't pass a simple budget...

2 posted on 02/04/2012 12:55:25 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267

you mean NAcy Pelosi’s insider trades in the past WERE LEGAL?

They should make this RETROACTIVE AND JAIL ALL OF THEM

Under what “law” WAS IT LEGAL TO DO THIS BEFORE?


3 posted on 02/04/2012 1:35:27 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267

you mean NAcy Pelosi’s insider trades in the past WERE LEGAL?

They should make this RETROACTIVE AND JAIL ALL OF THEM

Under what “law” WAS IT LEGAL TO DO THIS BEFORE?


4 posted on 02/04/2012 1:35:27 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I’d read the fine print before popping the champagne corks. I’m sure the bill has enough loopholes in it to make it a sham.


5 posted on 02/04/2012 2:15:24 PM PST by huckfillary (qual tyo ta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson