Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Fetus

The two statements seem irreconcilable. Looks like a legal fight coming.

To the Florida GOP’s point however, if Newt had won, I do not believe he would have offered to give Romney or the other candidates any of the delegates or looked to have them proportionally allocated.


7 posted on 02/02/2012 4:13:34 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

It wouldn’t be Newt’s to offer up. It would be up to Romney to protest and you know the party would have handed them over without question.

But then Newt would be making the counter argument. Either way it’s a mess and he does have a case. GOP might as well get rid of that rule of no winner takes all primaries if they can’t enforce it.

I wonder how they’d feel if Texas ruled they’d go to winner take all today?


8 posted on 02/02/2012 4:16:17 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

That burden is on Romney, or the other candidates. Not on Newt.


10 posted on 02/02/2012 4:21:41 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson