Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt 2012 Statement on Florida Delegate Allocation
GretaWire ^ | February 2, 2012

Posted on 02/02/2012 4:00:03 PM PST by Southnsoul

From my FNC colleague Carl Cameron:

Newt 2012 Statement on Florida Delegate Allocation

Atlanta, GA - Newt 2012 Florida State Chair and former Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum released this statement today about the campaign’s plans regarding the Florida GOP delegate allocation:

The Gingrich campaign is confirming that the Republican Party of Florida is to abide by RNC Rule 15(b)(2) and instruction from Chairman Reince Priebus in his letter of December 21, 2011. As noted by Chariman Priebus, “winner-take-all” states cannot hold a primary or caucus before April 1, 2012. Clearly the rules require that Florida’s delegates be allocated proportionately. In the unlikely event that the State Party will not be following its rules, the campaign will take appropriate action.

(Excerpt) Read more at gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fl2012; newt2012; rnc; winnertakeall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Southnsoul
"Winner take all" state can not hold a primary or caucus before April 1, 2012.

I keep reading this over and over, and I still don't get it.

To me it reads CAN NOT hold a primary or caucus, its the CAN NOT that grabs me.

If you Can Not hold a primary or caucus before April 1st, what in the heck just happened down there? Sounds to me like the whole primary was not valid. If that is the case then there is no delegates to be had.

21 posted on 02/02/2012 5:00:16 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul
Maybe the RNC should just throw out all the rules that they don't like and declare that you now need only 50 delegates to clinch the nomination?

-PJ

22 posted on 02/02/2012 5:09:31 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul

newt believes in global warming so might as well go all the way with gore act and whine


23 posted on 02/02/2012 5:16:56 PM PST by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

I wonder what the unintended consequences would be, but if millions of us changed all at once, it would SEND A VERY LOUD MESSAGE to the GOP-e.


24 posted on 02/02/2012 5:52:18 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: annieokie
"Winner take all" state can not hold a primary or caucus before April 1, 2012.

If I'm correct, Florida had already been penalized by it, losing half of the number of delegates. But that's not good enough for Newt, noooo...! Double jeopardy!

25 posted on 02/02/2012 5:55:44 PM PST by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

“Sounds to me like the whole primary was not valid. If that is the case then there is no delegates to be had.”

That is how I read it. LOL


26 posted on 02/02/2012 5:56:30 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
Thanks for the correction!

I think a lot of folks on this thread and probably throughout the conservative movement have been a bit shaken by the FL results. I know it's not what I was hoping for but let's get back on track.

The GOP rules are what they are. No body needs to go bonkers about foul play at this point.

Newt is going to be a hard sell to a lot of people, conservatives included. Just like Sarah Palin would be at this point. Let's try to keep our (unmentionables) out of a bunch until that time comes.

Wait... Strike that. Reverse it!

27 posted on 02/02/2012 5:58:46 PM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Right after the Primary in our state.


28 posted on 02/02/2012 6:03:47 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
It says no "winner take all state" CANNOT hold a primary or caucus before April 1st. That word CANNOT is the key.

If they CANNOT, and they DID, but SHOULDN'T have, then that primary is all NULL AND VOID.

You CANNOT do what they said you CANNOT do. Hey, I did not write that RULE, if they were stupid enough to write it that way, well it is VOIDABLE on the technicality of the word CANNOT.

29 posted on 02/02/2012 6:12:34 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
Glad I'm not the only one, reading that over and over and it just does not make sense.

Last time I checked CANNOT means you can not. NEWTTTTTT??? are you looking.

30 posted on 02/02/2012 6:14:51 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
"I wonder what the unintended consequences would be, but if millions of us changed all at once, it would SEND A VERY LOUD MESSAGE to the GOP-e."

My thoughts exactly!! Would love some input from those who know more about such things.

31 posted on 02/02/2012 6:22:35 PM PST by LADY J (“You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have.” ~Author Unknow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy; All

You regurgitate an old lie: “newt believes in global warming so might as well go all the way with gore act and whine” - and there is no way anyone on FR by now doesn’t know it’s a lie - So why don’t YOU take YOUR whine and stuff it?

NO ONE has refuted gore and GoreBull warming more emphatically that Newt - and not for a press sound bite - but testifying in the House - ON RECORD - in 2009. Care to give us a link to any evidence of ANYONE else so doing?

As Justice Joe Wilson famously said “YOU LIE.” and it’s getting old.............

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7VUg7nG3lw&feature=related


32 posted on 02/02/2012 6:24:33 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

Checking my tagline.


33 posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:46 PM PST by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Unfortunately the penalty called for in the Republican Party rules is a 50% reduction in the number of delegates rather than forcing the state to allocate delegates proportionally.

SC didn’t award its delegates proportionally either, so those would have to be recomputed also.

Now most states that have proportional have a 15% or 20% threshold. NH had a 10% threshold.

A proportional-with-a-20% threshold would yield 59 Romney - 40 Gingrich split.

So, maybe Gingrich should enlist 49 Floridians (include 9 Romney supporters) and demand they be seated at the convention. Invite Romney to enlist 22 South Carolinians, but insist that 7 of them be Gingrich supporters.


34 posted on 02/02/2012 9:47:03 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson