Replies

The self-righteous, "I'll never vote for McCain, so I won't vote at all" gave us Obama in the first place and now they--you--want to do the same again.

That's NOT true. Sarah Palin brought millions of hard core Conservatives to the polls with a SINGLE hope! That McLame would win and die in office the next day. I was one of those who WASN'T going to vote McLame. But I did simply because Sarah was VP. There were millions like me.

Had Palin NOT been on the ticket I believe McLame would have lost by an additional 10-20 million votes. Perhaps you remember the great 'TOM RIDGE' who almost became McLame's running mate!

Romney will lose in a landslide. You RomneyBots are certainly optimistic!

By the way, I knew Mitt when he was 15. I guess I have a little insight.

Ah, I hear the dulcet tones of the moron. "Romneybot???" Now that just too damn funny for words.

The inarticulate, irrational, ideologues always resort to calling anyone who dares disagree with them and their intransigence a Romneybot. You destroy any credibility you have by making that charge--not that you care.

Actually, your logic rivals that of the Paul supporters in your moral equivalency of Mitt to Obama. Whatever Mitt's failings, no one with half a foot in the real world could make that assertion with a straight face. Of course those who do so are the same sterling intellects who can blindly claim that Rush has been running interference for Romney, or that Rush has been promoting Romney (or Gingrich, or anyone else for that matter). You really do need to separate your emotions from your decision making--it's what conservatives do, make RATIONAL decisions, not emotional decision.

Romney is the least desirable of the possible selections, but anyone of them, even (gulp) Paul would be eons better than Obama in a second term and if you can't see that then you are truly living in a alternate universe.

"ROMNEY BOT, ROMNEY BOT, ROMNEY BOT!!! LOL! Ne'er emptier words have I heard from the peanut gallery.