[Kazan]

Liberal socialists must be defeated and beaten down as completely as possible.

What is Romney if not liberal socialist?

If Bill Clinton could run for a third term and ran as a Republican, he'd have more of a conservative record to run on than Romney.

Voting Romney weakens the resistance to socialism by allowing the Republican party to be moved significantly to the left and by, ultimately, wiping out a Republican majority in Congress as Romney destroys the party by signing off on liberal legislation.

[Sudetenland]

LOL! Yeah, that'll hold water. A man who made his fortune as the epitome of free enterprise and capitalism and who promotes free market capitalism--as a "liberal socialist."

For all his myriad problems, accusing him of being a socialist is laughable. Liberal, he may be, but he isn't a socialist, not when it comes to the economy.

I don't want him, but when it comes down to Republican nominee or Obama, there simply isn't any comparison--no way, no how.

[RipSawyer]

“If Bill Clinton could run for a third term and ran as a Republican, he’d have more of a conservative record to run on than Romney.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Sad but true and I despise Clinton. If JFK were to return he would be considered a wild eyed far right wing nutcase. Even Hubert Humphrey, the father of medicare, would be to the right of most Republicans now.

[CharlesThe Hammer]

I am condemning OBAMA! Obama must be defeated. All else is secondary. For heaven’s sake, we allied with Stalin when required. I will be happy to vote for the best conservative still standing when the primary comes to me...but all of these guys are far better than Obama. We must remain focused on that. If he wins another term, your angst over fine distinctions: Romney, Newt, Santorum; will seem trivial and sad as we weep for the loss of our country. Sorry if I was unclear.