Exactly. What is the point of this? So Newt is foolish because he could not predict what was going to happen to Joe Pa 13 years in the future? Sandusky did not retire until 1999. The incident that caused all the uproar about a coverup happened in 2002. So Newt was supposed to presciently know all of this? Even though it never hit anywhere in the mainstream consciousness until the 2009 Grand Jury, I think.
This article is really, really lame.
Seriously! Unless Newt went for advice on how to best ignore pesky child rapists this is a pretty pointless article