Located this post.
Reply By davidfarrar |
Did you know the Administrative Court also wouldn’t accept as evidence of a birth certificate a copy of a jpg image of a birth certificate downloaded from the Whitehouse dot gov site.
The question becomes: If the court does not accept a pic downloaded from the internet into evidence as an authentic birth certificate; why should Sec. Kemp, or the electorate of the State of Georgia?
ex animo
davidfarrar
MaineSkeptic FogBlower post.
“Straight from the horse’s mouth (yeah, I know):
David Farrar wrote:
This case is going to be wrapped up, possible as early as tomorrow, with Judge Malihi issuing a default judgement against candidate Barack Obama, with a recommendation that his name not be placed on Georgia’s PPP ballot due to his failure to produce a certified birth certificate.”
http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=339090#p339090
If this is true, it appears logical that Obama has to get to first base before he can argue that ‘jus soli’ means natural born citizen. As we all know, the loser has not done that. No evidence of being born on US soil submitted to the court is tantamount to being a foreigner.
Who is that? David Farrar... where was that posted?
Its interesting for certain, but really more relevant to Orly’s case.
Though.... really, Without ANY documentation that he was born in Hawaii, how can the court determine he was born there in the first place. No internet document is Prima Facie evidence. ONLY the document ITSELF is. A picture is only a picture and means nothing, particularly nowadays. So it makes sense that the court would reject what amounts to a picture. That is in accord with any chain of evidence.
This could get interesting..... You are right.