To: Kaslin
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.
6 posted on
02/01/2012 11:23:08 AM PST by
edwords
To: edwords; Jim Robinson; DarthVader; 50mm; darkwing104
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.
Time for
YOU to get gone. This website is NOT for Romney, nor will it ever be, so GTFO.
![](http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1787/romzap.jpg)
14 posted on
02/01/2012 11:34:46 AM PST by
mkjessup
(A loser to a loser who now endorses that loser is a loser. <-- iow, NO Romney, No WAY!)
To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney.
Get behind
who?
18 posted on
02/01/2012 11:38:24 AM PST by
Timaeus
(Willard Mitt Romney Delenda Est)
To: edwords
With only four states having had elections so far? You are out of you mind.
NO ROMNEY, NOW OR EVER
21 posted on
02/01/2012 11:39:56 AM PST by
Kaslin
(Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney. Getting behind Romney IS self-destruction.
Some of us have been observing and vetting Romney for more than five years, and understand that in a head-to-head of Obama vs. Romney, there is no "lesser" evil. They are equally depraved. A vote for either one would be a vote to encourage, enlarge, endorse, depravity in our America.
My vote would go elsewhere -- third party, write-in, who knows. I would CERTAINLY cast a vote somewhere in the Presidential so that it is on record that neither Obama nor Romney got that vote. One of the two might win, but I'd do what I could to make sure their vote tally could NEVER be construed as a mandate.
But let's hope that it ends up being Newt vs. Obama.
GODSPEED NEWT GINGRICH.
26 posted on
02/01/2012 11:43:11 AM PST by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
To: edwords
dude, Romo is the GOP self destructing..
40 posted on
02/01/2012 12:00:35 PM PST by
hope
To: edwords
I rather get behind a T-Rex with diarrhea, thank you.
To: edwords
Time to stop to self-destruction and get behind Romney. It is the definition of insanity to do the same thing over and over again and expect different results. Just how is Romney different from Obama besides skin color? I never voted skin color before and will not start now. Just would not be right in a civil war to have voted to put the enemy in power then have to shoot him out of it. That would be insurrection and would be wrong. And Civil War is where we are headed as I see it. Too old to fight, and don't want to see my country covered in blood, so I will not vote for Romney.
Progressives are the enemy, Who gives a toot if they have an R or D behind their name!?
46 posted on
02/01/2012 12:17:15 PM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: edwords
51 posted on
02/01/2012 12:36:41 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
To: edwords
No thanks, I could no more vote for romney than I could for obama. Plus, he is a mormon, as is Harry Reid. So that means that romney will effectively control the senate even if we do elect some good conservative senators. If Romney is elected, the republicans won't be able to hold his feet to the conservative fire, because romney, through harry reid, will have the democrats at his back. This is really bad news. With our prayers and our financial support, we can still get a better candidate, we have to!
52 posted on
02/01/2012 12:47:31 PM PST by
erkelly
To: edwords
A Romney nomination is the essence of self-destruction.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson