Skip to comments.
Gingrich: It's a 2-person race for GOP nomination
Aikens Standard ^
| 2/1/2012 12:39 PM
| Shannon McCaffrey
Posted on 02/01/2012 10:48:52 AM PST by Red Steel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
1
posted on
02/01/2012 10:48:58 AM PST
by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
Santorum got 13% without making half the effort Newt did.
he probably has just as much a right to stay in as Newt does
2
posted on
02/01/2012 10:53:47 AM PST
by
DM1
To: Red Steel
I had no idea how badly the hit on Santorum regarding his deceased child had hurt him until I happened to chat with a neighbor last night.
My neighbor is left leaning, an older educated man. He made reference to Santorum “playing with the dead child” with disdain. While how the Santorums handled the tragic event isn’t for me, I don’t judge that. I think it was reasonable, and told my neighbor so.
3
posted on
02/01/2012 10:55:44 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
To: Red Steel
Remember that Santorum will beat Romney in Missouri next Tuesday. Newt is not even on the ballot there. I’m hoping for a brokered convention at this point, though it is unlikely as every effort will be made to make this a two man race. If nothing else, it might actually excite some interest in the nominee.
4
posted on
02/01/2012 10:58:34 AM PST
by
Ingtar
(I never thought I would come to say it, but "Go Newt!" Our last, best chance.)
To: DM1
Romney’s spoiler should get out now.
5
posted on
02/01/2012 10:58:47 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: Red Steel
“TROUNCED”.. is hyperbole... Newt lost by only a few points.. He wasn’t trounced..
6
posted on
02/01/2012 11:01:40 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
To: hosepipe
I believe trounced was a reference to 50 delegates to zero.
7
posted on
02/01/2012 11:03:23 AM PST
by
Ingtar
(I never thought I would come to say it, but "Go Newt!" Our last, best chance.)
To: hosepipe
Newt lost by only a few points.. He wasnt trounced..
The last time I checked it was 15 points. Thats a lot more than "only a few". Just saying...
8
posted on
02/01/2012 11:06:33 AM PST
by
Veggie Todd
(I don't mind you hitting me, Frank, but take it easy on the Bacardi.)
To: Ingtar
.
50 delegates zero ...
Willard didn't have anything to do with that (winner take all) ... it was a Florida decision ...
.
9
posted on
02/01/2012 11:07:28 AM PST
by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
To: DJ MacWoW
the trouble is which one is the spoiler? Newt is brilliant one moment and a disaster the next. I have a feeling that SC was a one trick pony due to unique circumstances at the time. He won with a strong debate performance and took on the media. Can he replicate something like that? he did not shine in the Florida debates and was off message while campaigning.
Santorum for all his faults (and he has many) did very well in the last Florida debate. He also has been steadier than Newt in terms of a campaign infrastructure etc.
I guess we will have to wait and see who emerges stronger after a couple more contests.
10
posted on
02/01/2012 11:07:41 AM PST
by
DM1
To: DJ MacWoW
Romneys spoiler should get out now.
I second that.
11
posted on
02/01/2012 11:08:29 AM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Romneys spoiler should get out now.
I second that.
12
posted on
02/01/2012 11:08:57 AM PST
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 ! We should take off and Newt washington from orbit.)
To: Red Steel
Romney is only who he is because of Rick.
13
posted on
02/01/2012 11:10:32 AM PST
by
mo
To: Red Steel
14
posted on
02/01/2012 11:11:30 AM PST
by
onyx
To: DM1
Santorum is running interference for Romney. I have lost all respect for him. He also has less delegates than Gingrich. He’s acting as a spoiler and is without honor. Where’s his daughter and where is he? Hm? That and the mud slinging tells me all I need to know about him.
15
posted on
02/01/2012 11:13:00 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: brownsfan
My dog died in my arms. I wanted to hold him forever.
I can’t imagine letting go of an infant. I can’t imagine the pain of losing a child. That shouldn’t have been an issue.
16
posted on
02/01/2012 11:14:19 AM PST
by
FES0844
To: Red Steel
Newt, if you're correct then that really sucks because I don't think you or Romney can beat Obama.
17
posted on
02/01/2012 11:14:26 AM PST
by
ryan71
(Dear spell check - No, I will not capitalize the "m" in moslem!)
To: Red Steel
This is obvious. It is a two man race. He’s right.
Pick your poison, if you’re still into drinking whatever beverage the formerly grand old party serves up.
18
posted on
02/01/2012 11:14:52 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(The GOP: Hurtling down the road to join the Whigs, a hundred miles an hour on the Romney Express!)
To: Red Steel
Santorum served his sole purpose — thwarting Gingrich.
Stalking-dog Santorum exist to give Romney the nomination.
Indeed, if Santorum had not been in the race, it would have been a less-than-1%-victory.
19
posted on
02/01/2012 11:15:18 AM PST
by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: ZX12R
He’s a whiney brat that lost his own state in a spectacular fashion. He got 41% of the vote in 2006.
20
posted on
02/01/2012 11:15:28 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson