Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
In 1888 a pair of Levis cost &1.80. Seventy four years later, (1961) a pair of Levis cost $2.60. Today, 51 years later a pair of Levis cost $35 dollars.

Assuming the $1.80 price is correct, rising to $35 over 124 years works out to an average inflation rate of 2.4%. That's not too bad, except Levis uses thin denim now and third world labor.

I remember reading a newspaper archive from about 100 years ago and there was a sale on dresses advertised for around $24. Adjusted for inflation clothing seems to have gone down in price over the years largely due to automation in farming, sewing, and shipping from third world countries.

76 posted on 02/01/2012 12:18:53 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses
***Assuming the $1.80 price is correct, rising to $35 over 124 years works out to an average inflation rate of 2.4%. That's not too bad, except Levis uses thin denim now and third world labor.***

But I am looking at the difference in price between 1888 and 1961, then the difference between `1961 and 2012.

As for the denim, my mom (1970) used to say that Levis used to be made of a much heavier denim. Somewhere along the way they cheapened the product.

I had several pairs made in USA, Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and Colombia.

82 posted on 02/01/2012 1:11:40 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson