Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
In 2008 when Romney was behind, we all knew where Rush stood.

Context is essential here, 08 was a different time, different circumstance.

In 2012, when Romney is safely ahead, Rush is neutral.

Have you noticed how much things have changed since then?

We're in a whole new world now, new uncharted territory...desperation if you will.

Why is it so important to you what Rush says or who he endorses?

89 posted on 01/31/2012 4:16:59 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron

What changed?

In 2008 we were devoted to defeating Romney, (not Rush though).

In 2012 we are devoted to defeating Romney, (not Rush though).

Nothing changed except that this time we have an excellent challenger to Romney.

Why do you listen to Rush if you don’t think that he has any effect on politics? I’m really curious why Romney defeating Newt in the Florida primary doesn’t seem to bother you.


94 posted on 01/31/2012 4:39:13 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson