Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Personally think between Newt and Mitt; Rush's criticism has been pretty much - and unfortunately - an 'equal opportunity' effort.

Rush thinks that is 'good' - fair - but misses point that Newt needed/s more support; given he has far less per starting point. (Just as Rush offers; he IS the balance per Media). And so it is; the 'missing pieces' are on Newt's side.

Think Rush; has made a huge mistake in not taking more initiative; given that our country is hanging by a thread with oblivion threatening.

Desperate times, call for greater leadership. Rush has not gone there - at least - not 'far enough' per what we wanted to hear. Of course; he does read his tea leaves and so; can justify his positioning. And bottom line; it IS his show; his career; his judgment call.

119 posted on 01/31/2012 6:18:16 PM PST by cricket (America restored;. . .Newt CAN make it happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: cricket

Rush isn’t being “fair”, “neutral”, he is against Newt.

The thing that is undeniable, is that Rush could be as clear with Mitt and Gingrich, as he was with McCain and Romney last time.

RUSH: “I think now, based on the way the campaign has shaken out, that there probably is a candidate on our side who does embody all three legs of the conservative stool, and that’s Romney.”

“...national radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, who endorsed Romney on Tuesday
[February 5, 2008]”
Newsmax - Feb 6, 2008


126 posted on 01/31/2012 6:41:12 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson