Replies

Man, you have a real problem with being truthful and balanced, that is very apparent... my post said, sanctimonium has some real concerns about the Tea Party... which is exactly what the video says, he has C-O-N-C-E-R-N-S about the libertarian influences in the Tea Party and will speak out about those vocally and publicly, is how I think he worded it.

How does saying “he has some concerns about the Tea Party” translate in your bizarro world to I was saying he was anti-Tea Party. I was talking about the one answer in the video, not out of context, one question, one answer completely portrayed...

and in that answer, which was presented totally, he said he had some concerns about the libertarian elements in the Tea Party that are trying to refashion conservatism.. I don’t have those concerns, but then I don’t portray myself as the Perfect Principled Conservative, either... and he has other big governments tendencies, which have been legitimately pointed out, analyzed and criticized by people far wiser than me - and his negative libertarian comments are relevant to that..

this is two times you have called me a liar. I am getting really tired of it. Let’s get this down to a level where even you can understand: show me one place where I used the phrase “Anti-Tea Party”. I posted the link, which invited readers to go directly and see for themselves...

I support Newt with my heart and soul, have worked heart and soul for him, and will continue, and also “have some concerns” about certain stuff about him... and would never deny that... but the term Anti-Newt could never be applied to me... geez, get some gestalt why don’t you...

Maybe you could worry about the plank in your own eye, before you worry about me... You have attacked me now twice as being a liar, when I have shown you, out in the open that I am not, and you still need to apologize to me... I don’t expect that, though, as I have noticed most supporters of Sanctimonium are just as brittle, judgmental, hypocritical and holier-than-thou as he is...