Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration

That is a silly argument, because Newt is pro-life, so I doubt the Santorum support comes from single-issue votes. And given prior pro-life endorsements, I don’t think most pro-lifers are voting single-issue based on the 3 possible winners of the nomination at this point.

Judges will be a big issue, but again, I don’t think pro-lifers are thinking that Santorum or Gingrich would be that different on judges. By the record, Santorum has approved pro-choice judges, Newt hasn’t (because he was never in that position).

On the other hand, while I don’t know Santorum’s endorsement history, I know Newt endorsed at least one pro-abortion candidate, Dede Scozzafosa, over a pro-life candidate, simply because the pro-abortion candidate was the “republican”.

Every candidate on our side would be an improvement over the current occupant on the pro-life issue.


76 posted on 01/31/2012 7:58:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
Newt is pro-life, but Santorum makes that he center piece of his campaign.

Social conservatives are voting for him because they feel he is stronger on the issue then Newt.

77 posted on 01/31/2012 12:46:26 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson