[ZX12R]

You are incorrect. Paterno reported an account of the events as told to him by McQueary to both athletic director Tim Curley (Paterno’s boss) and Gary Schultz, THE HEAD OF THE CAMPUS POLICE.

Either get your facts straight, or quit being a dimwit and/or a liar, whichever applies. Gary Schultz was the V.P. of the school, part of his responsibilities was to oversee the campus Police. He WAS NOT a law enforcement official of any kind. He was merely a school administrator. Therefore, it was not reported to the police, either technically or figuratively. The V.P. might go to prison, for not reporting it to THE POLICE.

[PA BOOKENDS]

The charge that is pending is PERJURY

Get YOUR facts straight. And if reporting the the HEAD of the campus police is not the same, then we have a problem with sematics.

[Maryland Man]

You are incorrect.

Facts - the University has its’ own police force. An act committed on University property cannot be investigated by the State College police(I know this because I have a daughter up there being harrassed by an ex-boyfriend, which ended, thankfully).

Reporting this incident to Schultz was reporting to the man in charge of the campus police. He and Curley informed McQueary they would complete an investigation, which McQueary reported back to Paterno when Paternon followed up with him.

Shultz is not on the hook for not reporting to the police but for perjury to the grand jury.

THOSE ARE THE FACTS.

[PA BOOKENDS]

I retract what I said about the semantics problem. A reasonable person would reasonably assume that reporting to the head of an organiation is, in effect, reporting to the organization.

Really, are you so filled with anti-Penn State/Paterno animosity that at this point, when all the facts are not even close to being aired, you can’t allow for reasonable doubt?

You’d make a great trustee.