Eligibility Judge About To Lower The Boom On Barack?

Western Center for Journalism ^ | Jan 28, 2012 | Doug Book

[bkopto]

... Well Obama had been subpoenaed to appear in that courtroom. The subpoena had been specifically and without reservation upheld by Judge Malihi just 6 days earlier. So Obama was in obvious violation of the court’s order.

So maybe, just maybe Judge Malihi read the final words of Jablonski’s hyper arrogant, “we don’t believe your little state or your silly hearing are worth our time” letter for the purpose of reading into the record the fact that it was indeed the decision of Obama and his attorney to NOT attend and to NOT honor legal subpoenas.

And if that is the case, it means Malihi is clearing the decks for either a default judgment against the president, or the implementation of a legal remedy of some sort for Obama’s self-important refusal to appear or even respond to the proceeding with counsel.

Naturally it would take an attorney to decipher any “legal” significance in Malihi’s actions, but through his past rulings the judge has made it abundantly clear that he will follow the laws of the state of Georgia to the letter and accept no grandstanding or phony arguments from either side, not even from a president.

And it is against the law to ignore a subpoena, perhaps all the more so when the judge himself refused to allow Obama’s earlier request that the subpoena be quashed.

It might be significant that Georgia Secretary of State Kemp backed Malihi to the hilt in his response to Michael Jablonski’s letter, telling the lawyer “…If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

In short, though you and your client clearly don’t think much of our state or its laws, we will conduct the business of both just as though you were mere mortals rather than privileged characters.

When will Judge Malihi issue a ruling and what weight of law will it carry? Attorneys for both sides have until February 5th to present additional evidence for their claims. Soon after that we will know how determined the State of Georgia is in seeing to it their laws are obeyed…even by a president.

[DustyMoment]

Threatening a judge may not be wise for team obama.

Well, obviously, the threats won't be overt such as "if you rule the wrong way you could end up dead!". They'll be subtle to the extent that the Judge will get the point.

And, IMO, zero and his team have done this before. Remember Clinton and the IRS audits of folks who crosed him? zero learned at his knee and has followed suit.

[DustyMoment]

. . . . Judge Malihi is an administrative judge who looks at the evidence and makes a determination that goes to Georgia’s Secretary of State and HE makes the decision.

It is still considered a legal proceeding. The Judge's ruling may be sent to the GA SOS to make a ruling on whether Obama's name can be placed on the GA ballot, but it still sets a legal precedent that can be used in other court cases.

Administrative law judges are still judges and this is still a legal proceeding, regardless if there is a jury or a courtroom full of gawkers.

The person the Obama administration would have to pressure is Georgia’s Secretary of State Kemp. And he is really pissed off at Obama.

What someone else does with the judge's ruling is not the subject of this discussion. It is still the judge's ruling that will be used by others for whatever purpose they choose. For example, suppose Judge Malihi rules the way we want against Obama and sends that ruling up to the GA SOS. The SOS can consult the magical magnolia growing outside his window and decide to ignore the Judge's ruling and allow zero's name on the ballot. That's one scenario. Likely, at that point, zero's team of thugs would turn their attention on the SOS and HE would now be in their sights.

In another scenario, the judge rules in Obama's favor and the SOS says "no!" and denies Obama's name on the ballot. IOW, what the SOS does with the ruling is still separate from what the judge rules and what the judge rules still remains a matter of law that can be introduced as evodence in other legal proceedings.


Disclaimer - I am NOT a lawyer and don't play one on TV! However, I HAVE been involved in legal proceedings and have read a pretty fair amount about the judicial system and have a pretty good understanding of how it works. But, again, I ain't a lawyer!)

[SatinDoll]

I began researching Obama’s background in March, 2008. Over the next 10 months my computer was hacked four times. The first time I had the hacker tracked through the system and the trail led to a Senate office building in Washington, D.C.. That building contained Obama’s office. Why was I targeted?

Because I found evidence Obama was born in Kenya.

Butterdezillion and Miss Tickley, two researchers who have shaken the Hawaiian DOH, have both received telephone calls threatening the lives of their young children by name. Their discovery? BHO2’s original BC was filed but never accepted, indicating he wasn’t born in Hawaii. It was sealed and replaced by an adoption BC stating Lolo Soetoro was his father.

BHO2 sent a million $$ to Kenya in 2006, supposedly to help his cousin get elected President of Kenya. What actually happened was that hundreds of Chrisitans and American missionaries were murdered. One of those murdered was the woman who helped Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and her baby boy, Barry, travel back to North America in August, 1961.

I expect people to do what it right and just, to follow the U.S.Constitution. It doesn’t take extraordinary measures to follow the laws. It does take courage to go after what we want - to get our country back.

If we don’t see that the law is followed, then this nation is lost. I will not surrender, so riots it is.

By the way, those you warn will riot do so for some of the stupidest reasons, like football games. Let them live in the ruins they’ve created. As for Obama declaring Martial Law, he cannot enforce it without the Pentagon, and they’re not stupid.