Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7; ansel12

>> “Listening to Rush pretty regularly, he’s not pro-Romney.” <<

.
You’re not understanding the underlying dynamic.

Rush is not pro Romney, but he is owned top to bottom by the establishment. He dares not come out against Romney, nor for another candidate or his ride is over. Capiche?
.


441 posted on 01/28/2012 10:48:05 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor; Tribune7

I tried to tell myself that in 2008.

‘’I think the one candidate of the three still out there on our side that matter... in saying who more closely embodies all three legs of this conservative stool, you’d have to say that it’s Mitt Romney. There’s actually no choice in the matter.’’
(Monday, Feb 4, 2008)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020408/content/01125109.guest.html.guest.html

But on Bloody Thursday, I had to come to the conclusion that Rush really does support Romney strong enough that he will do anything that he can, to stop anyone who is seriously in Mitt’s way.

It has been five years now, two primaries, and when the chips are down for Mitt, Rush steps up for him.


443 posted on 01/28/2012 10:53:34 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson