Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kosciusko51
Finally, the churches should never have been forced to be classified non-profits.

Churches are not forced to be non-profit. They can renounce (churches, for whatever reason, are automatically considered non-profit without first having to apply for that status) their non-profit status & say whatever they want. Some have done just that here in Ohio.

...restrictions on what a church can or cannot say is a direct violation of the first amendment.

I disagree. If you accept/agree to non-profit status you accept the restrictions. Give up your tax exemption & say whatever you want.

10 posted on 01/27/2012 9:41:20 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: gdani

NO. A tax on the church is a restriction on the church. The reason this non-profit crap exists is the 16th amendment. There should have always be an exemption for church donations in the tax code, not a punitive “keep you mouth shut, or we will tax your donations, your buildings, and your activities” that we are forced into now.


11 posted on 01/27/2012 9:46:32 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson