Regarding the “... never resided in CT ...” issue, I worry that this is an elephant pit trap, because at least one time I came across some reference to a period of time when one of the assorted alleged parents of Obama (pre or post adoption - too complex for me to follow and remember all the ramifications) did in fact reside in CT for some period of time and that may have been how the CT SSA# was assigned to OB.
I’ll try to locate that item and post it if I can find it. Does anyone else recall seeing something like that?
Here’s an FR link from last April that has some info on the CT ‘connection’.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2705098/posts
That was BOR nonsense.
RE the CT connection:
I found several references that some “father” of OB (named Barrack Hussain Obama or Barack Hussein Obama or whatever spelling variation is the flavor of the day) DID in fact reside in CT for some unspecified period of time, and may have even attended some college or other therein.
BTW the issue of name spelling is another nagging concern to me - how many ways has OB’s “name” been entered into various databases? The following may or may not be the same person, w/o some constant of identification being tied to the individual (ie fingerprints, DNA or residence/school/work history):
Barack Obama
Barack H Obama
Barack Hussein Obama
Plus all the Sotero permutations ......
Let alone the perversion of Barack into Barrack that I found in one article.
Most LEGAL databases are going to contain a FIRST, MIDDLE (if one is assigned a middle name on their Birth Certificate) and LAST name.
From what I’ve read about OB, many of the reports on this subject are either:
(a) fifth grade sloppy reporting (not altogether surprising in an age when magazine covers misspell words and use the wrong tense),
or,
(b) the name has been cavalierly perverted in these various and sundry investigations.
Following the **TRUE** but mysterious BACKTRAIL of OB from the WH back to his birth will certainly be a challenge - it would be for anyone being investigated, even under normal circumstances.
If there has been any intentional obfuscation of OB’s history for nefarious purposes, then documenting the TRUE backtrail will be exceedingly difficult if not impossible, and will require SERIOUS diligence in accuracy of identifying data - much of which OB has INTENTIONALLY hidden from scrutiny by Executive Order.