Replies

Please. Gingrich is the frontrunner and the frontrunner always gets the most negative attention.

If you don't see anymore than that in this, then you simply aren't paying attention, or you're a Romney supporter.

It's glaringly obvious now that Drudge and Coulter both are bought and paid for hired guns for Romney, and therefore, the GOP establishment. Everyone on FR should be against that.

Don’t act like it’s some big revelation that Coulter and maybe Drudge are supporting Romney.

SO WHAT.

They are fighting to persuade people to their point of view and so are we.

If Drudge uses the Drudge Report to support a candidate, it’s his site and his right to do so, just like FR is JimRob’s site.

It’s not like if Drudge doesn’t link to these stories, they go away and no one opposes Newt Gingrich.

It's glaringly obvious now that Drudge and Coulter both are bought and paid for hired guns for Romney, and therefore, the GOP establishment. Everyone on FR should be against that.

If there is evidence that Ann Coulter and Matt Drudge are accepting payoffs from the Romney campaign, that would make a very interesting news story. While it's disappointing that Drudge is running all these anti-Newt articles, I don't believe that starting false rumors is a reasonable response. Finding a better source of news does sound like a reasonable response. Newsbusters seems like a good source, and I love Jodi Miller's videos, but even Newsbusters doesn't seem totally unbiased. They have this (also disappointing) cartoon on their home page (the comment below it is excellent):

National Public Radio had an article this morning where some guy was praising Romney. He opined that those of us who support Newt do so for emotional reasons, and that if we were thinking logically, we would go for Romney. I had to laugh, remembering the old saying "The flak gets thicker as you approach the target."