it took 33 posts and the owner to finally list something in rebuttal. Has this site only become flame throwers now ? If someone lists/ticks off a bevy of examples or reasons to support someone i always thought it was best to refute them with facts.
now I think Ann is wrong but to call her names and such and go to the lowest common denominator seems kind of callous.
Jim has chosen to go all in on Newt, I respect his opinion but I am not there yet regarding Newt , my hope is less mud throwing and more intelligent defense of positions.
I would also like to see more reasoned debate, instead of shouting “FU” to everyone who disgrees with the majority.
More light and less heat, please.
We are all coservatives here, or so I’d like to think.
Well isn't that nice of you, newbie.
lakewood conservative
Dec 9, 2001
but I am not there yet regarding Newt , my hope is less mud throwing and more intelligent defense of positions.
What you call mud - I call Truth. Duck, if you can't take it.
Me neither!