Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com
Running Gingrich against Obama would be like campaigning to replace the captain of the Titanic with the captain of the Exxon Valdez or the captain of the Costa Concordia. Coulter is simply spotlighting the many ways that Gingrich is unfit to be at the helm of the ship of state in a time when, if it hasn’t already hit the iceberg, it’s headed straight for it.
Compared to Bret Stephens, of course, she’s a cockeyed optimist:
http://online.wsj.com/article/global_view.html
JANUARY 24, 2012
The GOP Deserves to Lose
That’s what happens when you run with losers.
I’ve learned a lot from reading her columns and books over the years, despite the toxic rhetoric and her ‘take no prisoners’ debating style. Arguably, she is simply mirroring her adversaries’ toxic talk, even as they are so lamely and hypocritically “shocked, shocked” that a conservative has the nerve to call them out with rhetorical moves as outrageous as theirs.
Newt a conservative? Read all of Coulter’s columns on the Newt again: Gingrich is all over the field, but can usually be found wherever the density of available money to rent political insiders is highest, or the hottest available woman may be found.
Gingrich would be an empty suit, a hollow man, if he weren’t so full of himself (he truly resembles Obama in that way, though without a Michelle to trim his sails with the help of her own gargantuan ego and sense of entitlement). Another poster stated that he (she?) is praying for Newt. That is admirable and appropriate. It is also appropriate to pray for a better fate than Obama or Gingrich in the White House in 2013, although if the ship of state has already hit the iceberg (a real possibility given the fiscal wreck immediately ahead on the current course), it won’t really matter all that much.
http://www.economist.com/node/21540257
Perhaps it’s better to invest less effort in handicapping the next captain of USS Titanic, and give closer attention to checking out one’s flotation gear and drifting closer the life boats. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/21/us-usa-civilization-collapse-idUSTRE80K0LA20120121
(Don’t miss the reader feedback comments on this one; they’re illuminating and some are quite funny.)
Coulter’s excuse for Mittens being the father of Obamacare is that, well, Gingrich supported it, too?
Pathetic.
I noticed Coulter also studiously avoided mention of Romney’s gun control and homo hugging history.
What on earth happened to Ann Coulter?
BRAVO ANN!!!!
The single most important issue to me this election is the repeal of Obamacare. According to Norm, I don’t even need to vote if Mitt gets the nomination.
How’s that strike you Ann?