[BlackElk]

yup2394871293 has been here for a year (since 1/21/2011) but your post is in all other respects well taken and on point. Watch yup2394871293 not specify whom he supports.

[dragnet2]

Obama: "Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn't know what they're talking about."

GD liar!

[thesearethetimes...]

Thank you BlackElk for the clarification That is what reactionary posting, (without my glasses!), gets me : | Worse still, was neglecting to check out prior posts...

But, having done so now, has only compounded the confusion, and your observation about his hesitancy to state who he IS for is on the mark. Previous posts overall show an interesting mix of commentary; but aside from the post I responded to last night; nothing really out of bounds.

So yup... you don’t like Romney, Yay! Or 0bama ; ) But you don’t like Newt either, and don’t appear to think much of Santorum. Not a Palin fan, or of Herman, never really mentioned Huntsman or Perry and at one point wished for a brokered convention.... Interestingly enough, you discuss Paul a fair amount, but very carefully, generally from an electability standpoint.

So who DO you think needs to be elected, and CAN be elected? And, seriously asked, because as a nation; we do have to get this right this time; are they the same person?

May God guide our course.
FRegards,
Tatt