Perhaps you would like to point out the most important ones, why they're relevant, and why the scientific community should consider them published.
Because you obviously also don't think that LENR has any scientific basis. TRUE science is about reproducible facts, NOT theory. Theory is nice, but TYPICALLY comes after the garnering of reproducible facts, particularly in "paradigm-shaking" situations (a la the "Big Bang").
If you go the the LENR-CANR.org "Library" section, at the top of the page you will see a link entitled "Publications". Clicking this shows the articles organized by where published, with the list of journals in the left-hand window. Pick the ones from the journals "you" think are "most reliable". You might actually learn something.
"Creating fusion that produces more energy than it consumes, is commercially viable, and doesn't kill everything in a huge radius is extremely difficult. I'm confident that an ex-con from Italy with a tendency for incomprehensible tirades hasn't solved the problem."
Many other researchers with impeccable scientific credentials have also produced experimental evidence that the phenomenon is real, though with smaller COP than Rossi. The point isn't the COP, it's the existence of the phenomenon. But you just can't be bothered to look at the evidence, endlessly repeating your tired old "there's no theory" meme.