To: Lady Lucky
My only objection is to the use of a sneering, catty female voice. The female voice is intended to garner the female vote.
10 posted on
01/24/2012 4:38:58 PM PST by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: luvbach1
The female voice is intended to garner the female vote.They're dead wrong about that. I'm a woman and when I hear one talk like that I don't think "sincere" or "authoritative" or "helpful." I think something more like "witch."
Lord knows what men think when they hear that.
13 posted on
01/24/2012 4:50:34 PM PST by
Lady Lucky
(A tea party in name only is worse than no tea party at all.)
To: luvbach1
I swear every negative political ad in the last 15 years has used that same woman’s voice if they decided to use a woman. I’d love to know who she is....she must be very wealthy!
GREAT AD!
Hank
33 posted on
01/24/2012 9:03:10 PM PST by
County Agent Hank Kimball
(Screw it. Newt's the smartest candidate and the guy I want to see debating Obummer. Flame away.)
To: luvbach1
I have no problem with the voice in the ad at all, and I’m a woman.
51 posted on
01/25/2012 6:33:17 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson