Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Psalm 144

It’s funny that Newt is being vindicated on some of the earlier statements that he walked back. He said back in December that it was hard to imagine he wouldn’t be the nominee. And a couple weeks ago he called Romney a liar. Now we’re seeing the evidence to prove these assertions firsthand.

Now that Newt’s the frontunner, the “rise above the fray” strategy that Romney employed in Iowa might work. Newt can let his SuperPAC do the dirty work while he avoids direct attacks on Romney and pitches his message for the general election against Obama. These new Romney attacks seem so facile that he might actually be able to dismiss them as easily as he did John King’s question.

I also noted that Meet the Press today, while being highly unfavorable to Newt, made note that when Romney went into attack dog mode in 2008, he did a bad job of it. Considering how unlikable Romney is when he’s being nice, I can’t imagine how quickly the “mean” Romney will wear out his welcome.


166 posted on 01/23/2012 2:28:28 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

“Considering how unlikable Romney is when he’s being nice, I can’t imagine how quickly the “mean” Romney will wear out his welcome.”

I have seen videos of him debating some woman in Massachusetts, where he just looks daggers at her over some minor contradiction. Absolute snake eyed malice. He is a very nasty piece of work under all the oil and polish. So very much like Obama.


168 posted on 01/23/2012 2:34:12 AM PST by Psalm 144 (Preparation ZOT, for prompt relief from annoying romnoids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson