[newzjunkey]

It shows a lot of hypocrisy, though, on the part of the blow-hards who condemned Clinton for his womanizing but are willing to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to Gingrich’s sleazy activities.

You just can't help yourself in your sanctimoniousness. Is Newt's womanizing ongoing or well aired and in the past? Are there accusers of rape, sexual assault and the like against him? Has he lied under oath and obstructed justice?

Facts matter. Who's the hypocrite again?

[Yashcheritsiy]

You just can't help yourself in your sanctimoniousness. Is Newt's womanizing ongoing or well aired and in the past? Are there accusers of rape, sexual assault and the like against him? Has he lied under oath and obstructed justice?

Let's face it - anyone who tries to compare Newt's case with Clinton's is a moron of ground-thumping proportions.

Newt's marital indiscretions were a decade and a half age. Despite her being his third wife, he does appear, by all evidences, to be as happily and monogamously married as the other three candidates, including good Mormon Mitt Romney.

Newt has said he repented of his past sins. From everything we can see, this appears to be genuine, so I'm not sure why it's still an issue, other than the fact that it serves as a cheap, sleaze attack campaign tactic for supporters of other candidates.

[Finny]

newzj, I might be mistaken because I don't have the time to search back five year's-worth of posts, but I'm pretty sure Saundra Duffy was, at least in 2008, a TOTAL Romney supporter, 100 percent die-hard. I doubt she gives a flying fig about Santorum. SHE WANTS ROMNEY, and she knows the best way to get Romney is through what some of us here think is Santorum's very own "character issue" -- pride.

One of the Seven Deadly -- the Bible doesn't call pride, envy, anger, sloth, avarice, gluttony, and lust "moral failings" for nothing.