Of course, which is why I am requesting a shred of a hint of that “evidence.”
The Democrats foisted Obama on America using “evidence” that has never been substantiated. Conservatives have a duty not to fall into the same trap regarding any candidate for POTUS.
BTW, I am a retired certified fraud examiner (CFA). That doesn't allow me to appeal to my “authority” (a logical fallacy) but it does give me the training to assess behavior and evidence of fraud for its likely forensic value in court.
If I haven't SEEN any evidence that Stanley Ann is NOT Barry's mom, I can't apply any of my training and experience to it!
Meanwhile, it you look at my comment #200 I have actually "seen" (to the extent possible on the internet) lots of evidence that Stanley Ann IS, in fact Barry's mom.
Keeping the “BIG SECRET EVIDENCE” secret while Barry cruises along destroying the country doesn't make sense to me.
.
You very well may be a retired fraud examiner, but you lack the discretion that would make researchers comfortable sharing data with you.
I read enough evidence on the “Auntie” thread to convince me that Stanley Ann wasn’t the mommy.
I’m sure that hard evidence is being held close to the vests, by those who have it.