Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT
As I said, having released no evidence of your claim, do you (or those who you believe have this evidence) intend to wait until after Barry is re-elected before going public or to legal authorities in any way that this information could have any effect?

IMO it is NOT conservative to “believe” and assert as fact claims based on unsubstantiated speculation.

I would welcome a shred of actual documentary or other evidence that would support the claim that the mother Barry is NOT Stanley Ann.

204 posted on 01/24/2012 11:47:53 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; ...
.

Apparently evidence and the truth was never important.

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House certified Barry, and the Supreme Court met with him in closed chambers before Inauguration day, then Supreme Court Justice John Roberts officiated not one, but two swearing-in ceremonies.

They are "the legal authorities."

They knew he wasn't eligible.

Even if 0bama went on live tv, today, and announced his ineligibility, he would not be removed from 0ffice.

Apparently evidence and the truth was never important.

209 posted on 01/24/2012 1:46:04 PM PST by LucyT ( NB. ~ Pakistan was NOT on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

Maybe there is evidence you are not privy to. Ever thought of that?


210 posted on 01/24/2012 2:01:27 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson